Raiders / Public security work

Public work.
Inspect the evidence.

Security testing for crypto applications across web interfaces, APIs, backend services, infrastructure and operational dependencies.

Selected audits, vulnerability research and security-framework contributions. Each entry links to the published record and Raiders’ role.

Scope the work you need →Explore the evidence ↓

Professional background

Engineering context.
Security judgment.

Raiders brings 6+ years of security industry experience, including security engineering leadership and full-stack penetration testing for crypto projects.

  • Work connects smart-contract assumptions with the applications, identities, infrastructure and release paths around them. An engagement starts with the assets and user journeys that need protecting, then agrees on the actual review boundary.
  • Professional background describes Raiders’ experience. The linked records below show specific public contributions and report credits; each source establishes its own scope and attribution.

Primary sources

Explore the public record.

Published assessments, research and framework contributions, with the role and scope linked to each source.

Audit reports

Selected audit reports.

Each report identifies the assessed artifacts, review period, methodology and findings. Follow the original for the full scope.

2026

Audit report

MetaMask Connect — public audit summary

Cyfrin’s published v2.0 summary credits Raiders as lead auditor, with an assisting auditor. The scoped work spans SDK, mobile and extension integrations and relay infrastructure.

Role: Credited lead auditor in Cyfrin’s published summary

Recorded scope

  • SDK and wallet integrations
  • Mobile and extension communication
  • Relay infrastructure

Source: Cyfrin: MetaMask Connect public summary (PDF)

Read the original report ↗Link to entry ↗Related service →
2026

Audit report

Predict.fun Chainlink CRE integration — public audit summary

Cyfrin’s published v2.1 summary credits Jorge and Raiders as lead auditors. The reviewed integration includes Solidity adapters and TypeScript CRE workflows.

Role: Credited joint lead auditor in Cyfrin’s published summary

Recorded scope

  • Solidity adapters
  • TypeScript CRE workflows
  • Integration boundaries

Source: Cyfrin: Predict.fun CRE integration public summary (PDF)

Read the original report ↗Link to entry ↗Related service →
2026

Audit report

unflat collaborative audit

A public Sherlock report names Raiders alongside 0x69 as Lead Security Experts. The examined repositories include mobile and fund-flow service components.

Role: Named Lead Security Expert in a collaborative audit

Recorded scope

  • Mobile application
  • Fund-flow services
  • Authentication and local storage paths

Source: Sherlock: unflat collaborative audit report (PDF)

Read the original report ↗Link to entry ↗Related service →

Contributions & disclosures

Specific work.
Visible attribution.

Framework contribution

MITRE AADAPT — Supply Chain Compromise (ADT1195)

MITRE AADAPT lists Chirag Agrawal, Web3Sec.News, as a contributor to its Supply Chain Compromise technique. The entry describes manipulation of products and delivery paths, with context for the digital-asset ecosystem.

Role: Named contributor: Chirag Agrawal, Web3Sec.News

Recorded scope

  • Supply-chain compromise
  • Software distribution and delivery paths
  • Digital-asset operational dependencies

Source: MITRE AADAPT: ADT1195 — Supply Chain Compromise

View primary source ↗Link to entry ↗

Related service →

Framework contribution

MITRE AADAPT — Software Dependencies and Development Tools (ADT1195.001)

MITRE AADAPT also lists Chirag Agrawal, Web3Sec.News, as a contributor to the subtechnique Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools. Its scope connects compromised development components with cryptocurrency software and operational systems.

Role: Named contributor: Chirag Agrawal, Web3Sec.News

Recorded scope

  • Software dependencies and development tools
  • Malicious changes to trusted components
  • Wallet and digital-asset software supply chains

Source: MITRE AADAPT: ADT1195.001 — Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools

View primary source ↗Link to entry ↗

Related service →

Vulnerability disclosure2022

CVE-2022-4722: rdiffweb authentication bypass

Raiders’ public portfolio lists this research. The CVE record documents an authentication-bypass issue in rdiffweb before version 2.5.5.

Role: Research listed in Raiders’ public vulnerability portfolio

Recorded scope

  • Authentication
  • Web application security

Source: NVD: CVE-2022-4722

Research attribution: Raiders’ public research portfolio. The disclosure and research credit are linked separately.

View primary source ↗Research attribution ↗Link to entry ↗

Related service →

Vulnerability disclosure2023

CVE-2023-3067: Trilium stored cross-site scripting

Raiders’ public portfolio lists this research. The CVE record documents stored cross-site scripting in Trilium before version 0.59.4.

Role: First-person published vulnerability research

Recorded scope

  • Stored cross-site scripting
  • Application security

Source: NVD: CVE-2023-3067

Research attribution: Raiders’ published research write-up. The disclosure and research credit are linked separately.

View primary source ↗Research attribution ↗Link to entry ↗

Related service →

Framework contribution

SEAL Domain & DNS Security framework

SEAL’s framework overview credits Raiders as an author, connecting domain and DNS controls to the infrastructure behind applications.

Role: Named author on the published framework overview

Recorded scope

  • Domain and registrar controls
  • DNS security
  • Infrastructure dependencies

Source: SEAL: Domain & DNS Security overview

View primary source ↗Link to entry ↗

Related service →

Framework contribution

DNS monitoring, alerts and incident response

A second SEAL chapter credits Raiders for material on DNS change detection, alerting and response responsibilities.

Role: Named author on the published chapter

Recorded scope

  • DNS change monitoring
  • Alert ownership
  • Incident response preparation

Source: SEAL: Monitoring, Alerts, and Incident Response

View primary source ↗Link to entry ↗

Related service →

Community participation

ETHSecurity Badge holder

TheDAO Security Fund

Selected for TheDAO Security Fund’s ETHSecurity Badge in April 2026. The program recognizes researchers who help secure Ethereum and participate in decisions about security funding.

Selection announcement ↗About the badge program ↗Selection process ↗

Funded public goods

Ethereum security public goods

Web3Sec.News and DigiBastion have both received Ethereum-security public-goods funding through TheDAO Security Fund. Its transparency record lists both projects as funded recipients.

TheDAO Security Fund support

Web3Sec.News: Security Intelligence & Newsletter

Security intelligence, research and education

Public-goods security research and newsletter work for the Ethereum ecosystem.

View the fund’s recipient record ↗

TheDAO Security Fund support

DigiBastion: DNS, OpSec & Supply Chain Security

Domain, operational and supply-chain security

A public-goods initiative focused on the infrastructure and operational dependencies around crypto applications.

View the fund’s recipient record ↗

This support relates to the named public-goods projects. Commercial security reviews have their own agreed scope and deliverables.

Context and boundaries

Read the attribution.
Keep the scope.

  • Public links document the named work, role and scope. A collaborative report credit describes that contribution; it does not imply sole authorship, current employment by the publisher or endorsement of every Web3Sec service.
  • Framework contributor credits describe the published contribution, not employment, certification or endorsement of Web3Sec services by the framework publisher.
  • A report covers its stated artifacts and review period. Later releases and fixes require their own review. Confidential engagements are not turned into public case studies without authorization.

For the reporting method, inspect the clearly fictional finding walkthrough. That teaching specimen is separate from the original public work linked on this page.

Your system, its own scope

Bring the architecture.
Define the question.

A public artifact can help you assess how someone works. Your engagement still needs its own agreed system boundary, evidence, deliverables and decision owner.